| Senior tax relief plan ignites new battle over voter-approved tax law | Thursday, February 26, 2004 |
|---|---|
| Michael P. Norton | State House News Service |
|
Democrats and Republicans have waged [battle] this year over spending, reforms, and budget cuts. Now a new fight is brewing on Beacon Hill over tax relief.
Moments after Democratic lawmakers endorsed a series of local option proposals to help senior citizens cope with rising property tax burdens, Republican Gov. Mitt Romney said he's open to helping elderly homeowners but believes a key provision of the new plan undermines the tax-limiting Proposition 2 1/2. "I will veto anything which tinkers with Prop. 2 1/2," Romney said after meeting in his office with the chief sponsors of the 1980 ballot law, Barbara Anderson and Chip Ford. "What's on the table now does more than tinker. It undermines in a serious way the intent and purpose of Prop. 2 1/2 and therefore I will fight it in every way I possibly can." The House last week, on a voice vote, approved legislation exempting some senior citizens from tax increases passed on override votes. On Thursday, the Legislature's Taxation Committee endorsed a series of senior tax relief proposals, including the one approved by the House, and the broader package of tax law changes will soon be debated by the full Senate, according to committee members. The bill's supporters say too many senior citizens are being forced to sell their homes and move from their hometowns because while their incomes are fixed, their property taxes are soaring due to the roaring real estate market. But Romney says Democrats are more concerned with passing local tax hikes, and alleged the primary purpose of the bill is to convince senior citizens to stop voting against overrides. "Its purpose is to take the burden away from senior citizens and keep them away from the voting booth to stop Prop. 2 1/2 overrides, and instead causing hardworking families on limited incomes to be stuck with higher tax bills," Romney said. "That's the wrong way to protect senior citizens." A harmful side effect of the proposal, the governor said, would be to pass the burden of local tax hikes onto the unemployed. The governor did not endorse specific tax relief ideas, but said many are on the table and he is "very committed" to the idea of using government spending and tax policies to help senior citizens, especially those with low or fixed incomes. "We'll be open to the widest array of ideas to do that," said Romney. The governor suggested that cities and towns can do more to control costs and negotiate more favorable prices to avoid overrides. "Let's limit the size of government, limit the expense in our municipalities, be tougher in our negotiations with the people who are providing resources to cities and towns, get our costs under control, as opposed to raising taxes continually in property taxes or in other taxes," Romney said. Legislators say their ideas have been hashed out over four months in response to demands from senior citizens throughout Massachusetts and municipal officials who are both sympathetic to the plight of seniors and looking for ways to get tax overrides approved to offset cuts in state aid from Beacon Hill. In addition, lawmakers said, the proposals would take effect only if adopted by the local governing body. Anderson said lawmakers are using seniors to increase the likelihood of approval of local tax overrides, which require a two thirds vote to pass [sic - requires only a majority]. "There's something wrong here," said Anderson. "And it's obvious. It's transparent. And we're going to fight it because it's an assault on Prop. 2 1/2 and in the long run isn't going to do anyone any good, including the seniors." Based on her experience with local override efforts, Anderson said senior citizens are often not the direct beneficiaries of override votes and due to "human nature," often vote against local tax increases. She said that if the legislation is approved, seniors may not longer be part of the "front line defense" of Prop. 2½. Laura Russell of Sharon, a volunteer with the Massachusetts Councils on Aging, said she has voted for local overrides largely because her son attends middle school in the town. But Russell said she has sympathized with the impact of overrides on senior citizens and believes the bill will address their needs. "The Legislature would be wise to pass such a constructive bill," Russell said. "We need to help seniors who find they have no flexibility to be able to stay in their homes without going bankrupt. I know senior after senior who have been forced to move and pull up their roots." Russell said the statewide councils on aging group voted unanimously Friday to endorse the tax relief proposals approved by the committee Thursday. Committee co-chairwoman Sen. Cynthia Creem said municipal officials also sympathize with senior citizens and would welcome a chance to offer relief. "We're really excited about this," Creem said. "We know it will come out of the Legislature in one form or another and it will give seniors a break." She said the Senate Ways and Means Committee is likely to rework the bill, before it hits the Senate floor for debate and consideration of amendments. Sen. Robert O'Leary (D-Barnstable) said he hopes the bill "will help us pass some necessary overrides" and make more seniors eligible for tax credits by raising income and home value eligibility standards. "We need relief," said O'Leary. "There are people that are really in trouble." Here's a rundown of the bill's main provisions:
|
|
Send comments to:
webmaster@framinghamtpa.org
|
|
|
Every tax is a pay cut. Every tax cut is a pay raise.
Citizens for Limited Taxation |